Zuma’s Exit Was Proof of the Health of South Africa’s Democracy

Zuma’s Exit Was Proof of the Health of South Africa’s Democracy
Cyril Ramaphosa, then serving as South Africa’s deputy president, delivers a speech marking the 28th anniversary of Nelson Mandela’s release from prison, Cape Town, South Africa, Feb. 11, 2018 (AP photo).

Amid the drama last month of Jacob Zuma’s resignation as South African president and Cyril Ramaphosa’s subsequent inauguration, it was easy to overlook the resiliency of South Africa’s democracy during Zuma’s nine years in power, which were marked by poor governance, corruption and his authoritarian style. By the end, the political opposition, the judiciary, the media and the electorate all successfully exerted pressure on the ruling African National Congress to remove him. Zuma’s departure was a crisis for the ANC, but not for South Africa’s democratic institutions and the rule of law.

When it decided that he had to go, the ANC followed party and parliamentary procedure to the letter. Unlike the unexpected exit last year of long-time President Robert Mugabe in neighboring Zimbabwe, Zuma’s departure was no coup, either by the party or within the state. It is fair to say that in a country with lesser institutions and a weaker commitment to democracy, Zuma might instead have held on and even consolidated his power, following the path of Paul Kagame in Rwanda, Laurent Kabila and his son, Joseph, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Yoweri Museveni in Uganda.

Zuma’s poor performance as president of South Africa is widely acknowledged. At home and abroad, Zuma’s lack of leadership, coupled with a long list of credible allegations of corruption, generated unwarranted pessimism about the future of the country. South Africa’s democratic institutions, however, met Zuma at every turn. The courts blocked his initiatives that were incongruent with the human rights and civil rights guarantees of the constitution, among the most extensive in the world. The media and civil society doggedly exposed his political and personal misbehavior. Opposition political parties—and members of his own party, to an extent—resisted Zuma through their expert use of parliamentary procedure to ensure the delay, reconsideration and eventual revision of his agenda. Finally, the voters increasingly turned against the ANC, which has dominated South African politics since the end of apartheid.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review