Xi’s Third Term Would Be Another Step Backward for China

Xi’s Third Term Would Be Another Step Backward for China
Chinese President Xi Jinping leads other top officials pledging their vows to the party during a gala show ahead of the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing, June 28, 2021 (AP photo by Ng Han Guan).

China is gearing up for the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party to be held later this year, where, according to the consensus view, President Xi Jinping’s historic bid for a third term as the party’s general secretary is all but assured. But for many clear-eyed observers, including inside China, an unprecedented third term for Xi is hardly a cause for celebration. Under his rule, China’s assertive foreign policy has alienated foreign governments and trade partners, while its economy is faltering under the weight of Beijing’s “zero COVID” coronavirus policy. Over the duration of Xi’s tenure, dissenting voices inside the CCP and elsewhere have been purged as part of a cult of personality built around him, while aggressive displays of nationalism have become a convenient tool to whip up support and distract from policy failures elsewhere.

In desperation, many of those disillusioned by Xi are increasingly looking to Premier Li Keqiang, who has taken a more active policymaking role in recent weeks, to serve as a credible counterweight. But as many analysts argue, such hope is misplaced, if not entirely misguided. The sweeping changes in the political landscape over the past two years, they argue, are a harbinger of what a third term for Xi would hold in store for the country and the world at large.

There are plenty of reasons for observers to be concerned about China’s rise to world-power status. The past two years have seen an escalation in China’s assertive “Wolf Warrior” approach to foreign policy, from a spat with Australia over a tweet to public confrontations with U.S. diplomats in high-level meetings. The stark ideological differences between China and the West were laid bare in the two sides’ respective responses to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Beijing, which insists that it is neutral on the conflict, has nonetheless expressed an unwavering commitment to its strategic partnership with Moscow, further degrading already tense relations with the U.S. and the European Union.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review