With No-Show in Paris, Obama Remains in Reactive Mode

With No-Show in Paris, Obama Remains in Reactive Mode
Leaders from Israel, Mali, France, Germany, the EU and Palestine march during a rally in Paris, France, Jan. 11, 2015 (AP photo by Philippe Wojazer).

The failure of U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration to send a high-level representative to the Paris unity march, convened in the wake of the terrorist attack on the editorial offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, is being described by some as the first foreign policy gaffe of 2015.

Given the Obama team’s laser-like focus on domestic issues in the run-up to the State of the Union address, however, it is not surprising. Moreover, given that one of the administration’s goals seems to be to halt further deterioration in the critical U.S.-India relationship, it is very understandable why the president chose not to divert Secretary of State John Kerry from his advance mission to New Delhi to prepare for Obama’s own visit later this month. The administration knows that despite its announced rebalance to the Pacific, Asian leaders are all too aware of Obama’s tendency to shift them to the back burner whenever troubles arise in Europe or the Middle East. Even at the risk of damage to a long-established relationship with France, keeping Kerry in New Delhi was an acknowledgement that India would not be prepared to accept a rain check yet again.

What is surprising, however, is the president’s apparent reluctance recently to use Vice President Joe Biden as an emissary. During the 2013 sequestration crisis, when Obama skipped the East Asia Summit, he sent Kerry instead of having Biden assume the role of presidential stand-in—guaranteeing from a protocol perspective that the U.S. representative would be at the bottom of the totem pole in the presence of heads of state like Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Given the parade of prime ministers and foreign ministers who marched in Paris—including Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov—having Biden as the U.S. representative would have sent a very clear signal of U.S. intent. One wonders whether the administration is attempting to prevent Biden from positioning himself as “presidential material” on the world stage, or fears that he might upstage Obama himself.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.