Will Trump Base U.S. Security Strategy on a ‘Clash Of Civilizations’ Outlook?

Will Trump Base U.S. Security Strategy on a ‘Clash Of Civilizations’ Outlook?
President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Giant Center, Hershey, Pa., Dec. 15, 2016 (AP photo by Matt Rourke).

The presidency of Donald Trump promises to shake up American politics and break with the past in many ways. In foreign and security policy, one big change that seems likely is a transformation of U.S. policy toward Russia, since President-elect Trump has indicated he will shift the currently adversarial relationship toward one of greater cooperation.

At first glance this seems perplexing given that Republicans have always led the opposition to Russia, whether in containing Soviet communism during the Cold War or attempting to block Russian President Vladimir Putin’s more recent efforts to regain control over the independent nations that were once part of the Soviet Union. But in a brilliant essay for The Atlantic, Peter Beinart explained why Trump and members of his foreign and national security policy team like National Security Adviser-designate Michael Flynn and Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson seem to have abandoned the GOP’s hostility toward Putin. American conservatives, Beinart argues, come in two forms. What he calls “ideological conservatives” once opposed the Soviet Union because it was the enemy of freedom; they now dislike Putin for the same reason. So-called cultural conservatives opposed communism because it was atheistic and sought the destruction of the predominantly Christian culture of the West.

After the post-Cold War period, cultural conservatism was pushed to the fringe of the GOP. When violent Islamic extremism emerged as a major threat to the United States after the Sept. 11 attacks, the response to it was framed by ideological conservatives. Led by then-President George W. Bush, they saw Islamic extremism as a new form of revolutionary totalitarianism. But ideological conservatives also opposed Putin’s authoritarianism since it, too, was the enemy of freedom.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.