Will Russia Make Nuclear Security Next Victim of Ukraine Crisis?

Will Russia Make Nuclear Security Next Victim of Ukraine Crisis?
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov addresses the media at the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) in The Hague, Netherlands, March 24, 2014 (AP photo by Yves Logghe).

Russia’s decision to skip the first planning meeting for the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) is an alarming sign that U.S.-Russia tensions over Ukraine and other issues may disrupt their nuclear security partnership. At best, the Russian decision may simply reflect an attempt to signal irritation at the U.S. by disrupting one of Washington’s highest priorities, that of countering nuclear terrorism. At worst, it may represent a decision to boycott the entire NSS process simply because the United States is hosting it.

In either case, the Russian decision is extremely counterproductive. In the short term, it risks sabotaging the tacit decision of both sides to continue cooperating, despite the current tensions, on critical nonproliferation issues, ranging from completing the removal and destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons stocks to finalizing an Iranian nuclear deal and removing dangerous stocks of Cold War-era nuclear material. Indeed, bilateral cooperation in this latter realm contributed to removing the remaining fissile material from Ukraine in 2012, thereby depriving that country of an easy near-term option for developing nuclear weapons and limiting the risks and stakes of the current crisis there.

The conflict between Russia and the West over Ukraine did not seem to harm the March 2014 NSS in The Hague, nor has it caused Moscow to break with the West in nuclear negotiations with Iran. It did not prevent recent successes in U.S.-Russian nonproliferation projects with such countries as Kazakhstan and Poland. Similar scenarios requiring urgent cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation might occur in the future due to regime changes or national emergencies elsewhere, such as the demise of North Korea’s dysfunctional Communist regime or a threatened terrorist seizure of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review