Why the International Response in CAR Can’t Contain the Violence

Why the International Response in CAR Can’t Contain the Violence
French President Francois Hollande inspects arms confiscated from ex-Seleka rebels at a French military base in Bangui, Central African Republic, Feb. 28, 2014 (AP Photo/Sia kambou, Pool).

Despite a cease-fire in July and a United Nations mission in September that raised hopes of restoring order, the crisis in the Central African Republic (CAR) flared up again last month. The conflict originated with the rise of the Seleka, a predominantly Muslim insurgency that launched in December 2012 and overthrew CAR’s President Francois Bozize in March 2013, a decade after Bozize took power in a military coup. After presiding over mass violence and internal displacement, Seleka leader Michel Djotodia was forced to resign from the presidency in January 2014 at a regional summit in Chad. But interim President Catherine Samba-Panza has been unable to stem the bloodshed between the Seleka and the mostly Christian anti-Balaka militias that have arisen in response.

In October, French and U.N. peacekeepers clashed with the Seleka, resulting in a number of casualties. This week, the European Union extended its mission in CAR at the request of the government in Bangui and the U.N. Security Council. Yesterday, Seleka rebels blocked two highways and exchanged gunfire with peacekeepers in Bangui, before returning to their camps today under U.N. pressure.

International human rights groups have repeatedly warned that the conflict in CAR risks developing into genocide, although a U.N. report in June disputed this characterization. Louisa Lombard, an anthropologist at Yale University and an expert on CAR, downplayed the religious dimension to the violence in The New York Times in April. “None of these tensions are over religion in an ideological sense,” she wrote. “Rather, the chaos of war and its simplifying/mobilizing slogans has provided cover for attacks that stem from diverse, often localized, social tensions.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.