Why Ban Ki-moon Might Deserve a Fond Farewell at the U.N. After All

Why Ban Ki-moon Might Deserve a Fond Farewell at the U.N. After All
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon during an interview with the Associated Press, Marrakech, Morocco, Nov. 16, 2016 (AP photo by Mosa'ab Elshamy).

This may be one of the last times I write about Ban Ki-moon, a thought that makes me unexpectedly melancholic.

The United Nations secretary-general will hand over his duties to Antonio Guterres at the end of the month, after 10 years in office. Over that time, I estimate that I have written about 50,000 to 60,000 words about Ban’s performance, in addition to more general pieces on U.N. diplomacy. Quite a few of those words have been unkind: I have frequently criticized Ban for being too cautious, too hidebound by protocol and too slow to grasp many of the U.N.’s operational problems.

I once called him a “chump” and a “poodle.” More recently, in line with other commentators, I have said nicer things about his stalwart and successful efforts to secure the ratification of the Paris climate change treaty. His decision this month to offer a public apology, albeit a late and incomplete one, for U.N. peacekeepers’ role in causing and mismanaging the outbreak of cholera in Haiti showed basic decency.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.