Why Ban Ki-moon Might Deserve a Fond Farewell at the U.N. After All

Why Ban Ki-moon Might Deserve a Fond Farewell at the U.N. After All
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon during an interview with the Associated Press, Marrakech, Morocco, Nov. 16, 2016 (AP photo by Mosa'ab Elshamy).

This may be one of the last times I write about Ban Ki-moon, a thought that makes me unexpectedly melancholic.

The United Nations secretary-general will hand over his duties to Antonio Guterres at the end of the month, after 10 years in office. Over that time, I estimate that I have written about 50,000 to 60,000 words about Ban’s performance, in addition to more general pieces on U.N. diplomacy. Quite a few of those words have been unkind: I have frequently criticized Ban for being too cautious, too hidebound by protocol and too slow to grasp many of the U.N.’s operational problems.

I once called him a “chump” and a “poodle.” More recently, in line with other commentators, I have said nicer things about his stalwart and successful efforts to secure the ratification of the Paris climate change treaty. His decision this month to offer a public apology, albeit a late and incomplete one, for U.N. peacekeepers’ role in causing and mismanaging the outbreak of cholera in Haiti showed basic decency.

Keep reading for free.

Register below for instant access to the rest of this article (no credit card required). You'll also get our free newsletters and two pieces of expert analysis each month. Simply click one of the icons below to instantly login with a social account, or use your email address:
Or skip to premium access for just $12 for the first 12 weeks.
After 12 weeks you'll be charged $77 annually.