Venezuela Could Force a Foreign Policy Reckoning for U.S. Progressives

Venezuela Could Force a Foreign Policy Reckoning for U.S. Progressives
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, left, and Rep. Ilhan Omar, center, walk down the House steps to take a group photograph of the House Democratic women members of the 116th Congress, Washington, Jan. 4, 2019 (AP photo by Andrew Harnik).

The standoff pitting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro against National Assembly leader Juan Guaido, who declared himself interim president two weeks ago, continues to paralyze the country. It has also highlighted a political divide outside Venezuela—in particular in the U.S. between advocates and critics of the Trump administration’s pursuit of regime change in Caracas. That debate has broader implications for the formulation of a progressive foreign policy framework in the runup to the U.S. presidential election in 2020.

After the U.S., joined by most of the governments of South America and Europe, recognized Guaido as the legitimate head of state, a group of progressives headed by Noam Chomsky released an open letter calling for an end to U.S. interference in Venezuela’s domestic affairs. The group’s main thrust is not to defend Maduro or the Chavista regime, but rather to argue that the Trump administration’s aggressive policy risks throwing Venezuela into more chaos and perhaps even civil war.

The letter, which was published before the Trump administration’s announcement of sanctions against Venezuela’s state-run oil company, exaggerates the degree to which targeted U.S. sanctions contributed to the country’s economic and humanitarian crises. But it stops short of blaming the U.S. for Venezuela’s meltdown, and the dangers it goes on to warn against are real and plausible. On that count, it is a relatively judicious critique of the administration’s policy, particularly compared to The Intercept, which talks about a White House plot “to bring down the government of Nicolas Maduro” and an “openly promoted . . . campaign to steal Venezuelan oil for the benefit of U.S. corporations.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review