U.S.-Georgia Defense Talks Leave Tbilisi Smiling

U.S.-Georgia Defense Talks Leave Tbilisi Smiling

The Oval Office meeting between U.S. President Barack Obama and Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili on Jan. 30 has already been chalked up as a major victory by Tbilisi. Obama and Saakashvili discussed a range of topics, including the development of Georgia’s democracy, the country’s future transition of power and a possible free trade deal. For the Georgian government and their allies in the media, however, increased defense ties were the centerpiece development. Yet aside from an oblique reference by Saakashvili to “elevating our defense cooperation further,” details on any changes in the military relationship have been scarce.

Several figures in Saakashvili’s government, including the president himself, have described the talks as constituting a “new level” of defense cooperation, but have refrained from elaborating. And other than references to Georgia’s generous contribution to ongoing military operations in Afghanistan, U.S. officials have been even more coy about the extent of current cooperation and what might be meant by taking it to a new level.

By far the most visible issue surrounding recent U.S.-Georgia defense relations has been that of arms sales, which the U.S. discontinued after Georgia’s tiny military was routed by Russia in the 2008 war between the two countries. Fearing another Russian invasion, Georgian officials have aggressively lobbied Washington to restart arms sales -- particularly of advanced anti-aircraft and anti-armor systems -- to better counter Russia’s overwhelming military advantage. But in the waning days of the George W. Bush administration, the U.S. and Georgia signed a strategic partnership charter that clearly favored a “brains before brawn” approach to defense cooperation, focusing on improving operational issues within the Georgian military rather than weapons sales. And despite a bill in the U.S. Congress advocating for renewing arms sales to Tbilisi, there is little evidence that the White House intends to take that route.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.