Toward Cyber Arms Control with Russia

Toward Cyber Arms Control with Russia

In the past few years, concerns over the growing risk of cyber warfare have been supplemented by evidence of actual cyber attacks, many likely launched with the aid of nation-states. When the United States sounds the alarm on cyber malfeasance, disruption or espionage, China or Russia are typically "the usual suspects." It's interesting, then, that a delegation of Russian officials, led by Gen. Vladislav Sherstyuk, visited Washington in November for meetings with officials of the National Security Council and the Departments of Defense, State and Homeland Security.

Currently a deputy secretary of the Russian Security Council, Sherstyuk was identified by Jane's as Russia's "eavesdropper-in-chief" more than a decade ago. Beginning with his recruitment by the KGB in 1966, Sherstyuk's career in intelligence went on to include positions in Soviet communications and signals intelligence. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, he landed at -- and eventually ran -- FAPSI, the signals intelligence operation spun off from the KGB and later reincorporated into its successor agency, Russia's FSB. Sherstyuk stayed on at FAPSI until 1999, before moving over to his post on the Security Council. A Moscow State University physicist with experience in radio, cryptography and computing, Sherstyuk is a logical choice to head up a cyber-security negotiating team for the Russians. But what did Russia send him to Washington to achieve?

Press coverage of Sherstyuk's visit speculated that, in addition to holding talks on the further reduction of their aging nuclear arsenals, the United States and Russia are finally talking about both arms control regarding cyber weapons and additional cooperation on cyber crime. Certainly the need for such an accord exists. Although near-ancient history in the world of cyber conflict, the electronic attacks against Estonia in April-May 2007 gave a strong indication of Russia's offensive cyber capabilities. Russia never actually admitted to involvement in that incident, but there is enough data from the following summer's war with Georgia to conclude that cyber attacks were indeed employed as part of the broad spectrum of military tools unleashed against Tbilisi. Taken in tandem, these two episodes constitute reasonable evidence that Russia has employed cyber capabilities to assert influence beyond its borders.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review