There Is No Strategic Rationale for Trump’s Appeasement of Putin

There Is No Strategic Rationale for Trump’s Appeasement of Putin
A woman holds a sign depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump during a protest outside the White House, Washington, July 17, 2018 (AP photo by Andrew Harnik).

Everyone other than President Donald Trump’s most ardent loyalists considered his performance at—and after—this week’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin a disaster. Standing beside one of America’s most skilled adversaries, Trump blasted his own domestic political opponents, while again adopting the language of dictators by calling the nonpartisan media “an enemy of the people.” He once again accepted Putin’s denial of Russian meddling in America’s 2016 election despite the U.S. intelligence community’s conviction that it happened. Instead of highlighting the deep policy differences between the United States and Russia, Trump adopted the Russian positions on what caused the deterioration of bilateral relations. And in stark contrast to the way he treated America’s close NATO allies a few days earlier, he lavished praise on Putin.

Criticism was immediate and vociferous. CNN’s John King called the Helsinki meeting Trump’s “surrender summit.” Columnist Max Boot described it as the “sellout in Helsinki.” Sen. John McCain decried the post-summit press conference as “the most disgraceful performance by an American president in memory.” Former CIA Director John Brennan tweeted, “It was nothing short of treasonous.”

One headline in particular stands out: a story by the New Yorker’s Robin Wright that referred to Helsinki as “Trump’s appeasement summit.” The use of the word “appeasement” is important. Often applied to then-British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlin’s approach to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany in the late 1930s, it is highly pejorative, suggesting a futile and misguided surrender to the demands of an aggressor. Calling a policy “appeasement” is intended to sting.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review