The United States’ Evolving Stance on the ICC

The United States’ Evolving Stance on the ICC

For observers and advocates of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Feb. 26 U.N. Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Libya (.pdf) was nothing short of a breakthrough: It marked the first time a decision to refer crimes to the ICC was backed by all members -- including the United States, which has been openly hostile to the court for much of its existence.

Three weeks later, the U.S. showed support for the ICC yet again, albeit less publicly. During informal talks at the Security Council on March 18, a Kenyan delegation lobbied for a one-year deferral of two ICC cases stemming from the country's 2007-2008 post-election violence that claimed more than 1,000 lives. High-ranking Kenyan politicians have been named as suspects in both cases, and the delegation argued that the court's actions jeopardized "international peace and security." But the U.S., joined by France and the U.K., steadfastly opposed the deferral bid, effectively killing its chances.

In light of these two endorsements, can the U.S. now be counted among the court's staunch allies? Not exactly, experts say.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.