The Realist Prism: U.S. Stance on Eurasian Union Threatens Russia Reset

The Realist Prism: U.S. Stance on Eurasian Union Threatens Russia Reset

Speaking last Thursday in Dublin to a group of human rights activists on the sidelines of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) conference, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton effectively sounded the death-knell for the reset in U.S.-Russia relations. Commenting on Russian proposals for creating a Eurasian Union comprising Russia and other former Soviet republics, Clinton bluntly described the plan as a “move to re-Sovietize the region” and said that the United States is “trying to figure out effective ways to slow down or prevent it.”

Given that the proposal to develop the Eurasian Union was at the heart of the foreign policy platform that Russian President Vladimir Putin unveiled prior to his presidential election, it is difficult to understand how Washington feels it can oppose the initiative yet retain cooperative relations with Moscow in other areas. In a pre-election essay penned by Putin last October, he described “stronger integration on a new political and economic basis” between Russia and its neighbors as “an imperative of our era.” Building on an existing customs union between Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, the new Eurasian Union, which Putin hopes could be created as early as 2015, would be modeled on the European Union. The ruling United Russia party has endorsed the project, noting that the Eurasian Union “should bring together nations that are historically or culturally close to Russia and that are ‘loyal to Russia's interests.’”

Whether the Eurasian Union is a good idea for Russia or for the other states in the post-Soviet space is a separate debate. What is clear is that Putin, as well as some other regional leaders like Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, view a Eurasian Union as necessary to fill the vacuum created by the stalling of the European project in the west and the rise of China to the east. From the Russian perspective, the “new EU” is designed to thwart the effective partition of the territory of the former Soviet Union into European and Chinese spheres of influence. Instead, the Eurasian Union is envisioned as “one of the global poles of power, connecting Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.” And the proposed union’s governance would be constructed to give Russia the leading role in framing its direction, ensuring that Moscow would serve as the “choirmaster” of the Eurasian bloc of states.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.