The Realist Prism: American Decline and the Future of Interventionism

The Realist Prism: American Decline and the Future of Interventionism

The debate over whether or not the United States is in decline is more than just a parlor game among pundits and academics, as the answer to that question informs starkly different policy choices for the country. For significant portions of the anti-interventionist left and right -- the latter represented by the small but vocal constituency of GOP presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul -- a United States that is in decline ought to cut back on its engagements abroad and avoid playing the role of the world’s policeman, and instead focus on rebuilding America’s domestic institutions, particularly its economy. While President Barack Obama faces no challenger for the Democratic nomination, this “fix America first” sentiment is strong among key segments of his own core voter base as well. On both left and right, the need to turn inward is often coupled with concerns over the rise of China and the belief that Beijing’s power is growing while America’s is being frittered away in a series of ill-advised interventions.

The pro-intervention groups, especially the foreign policy “establishments” in both political parties, tend to discount the talk of decline. America’s ills have been exaggerated, they argue, and the capabilities of other rising powers overrated. Besides, who else will sustain the current liberal international order if not for Washington? It is not surprising that Obama is said to be reading Robert Kagan’s latest offering, “The World America Made,” which is a full-throated defense of these very arguments.

The problem is that both sides are talking past each other, often cherry-picking facts to buttress their own arguments. In an interesting case of mirror-imaging, both declinists and anti-declinists often take the most negative or the most positive scenario regarding U.S. economic growth and vitality and juxtapose it against the opposite one for China. The reality, as Ian Bremmer chronicles in his forthcoming work, “Every Nation for Itself,” is that there are no guaranteed "winners" or "losers" in the near future. The United States is not fated to fall, nor China to rise; both nations have major challenges before them that will test the flexibility and responsiveness of their political systems to provide solutions.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review