The Pandemic Is Providing Cover for ‘Opportunistic Repression’

The Pandemic Is Providing Cover for ‘Opportunistic Repression’
Demonstrators gather during a protest against Tunisian President Kais Saied, in Tunis, Sept. 18, 2021 (AP photo by Riadh Dridi).

On Wednesday, Tunisia announced that it had restored its pandemic-era restrictions, imposing a 10 p.m. curfew and banning all gatherings for two weeks. According to President Kais Saied’s government, the decision was made in order to combat the recent, rapid spread of the coronavirus’s omicron variant. Yet the timing was suspect. It came merely two days before rival political parties were scheduled to lead a massive demonstration against Saied’s concentration of power in his own hands. The main opposition party, Ennahda, immediately promised to defy the ban and called for its supporters to demonstrate anyway. 

Tunisia is not an isolated case. Since the beginning of the pandemic, scholars have argued that COVID-19 policy responses could mask illiberal political agendas, especially in fragile democracies and autocracies. In the spring of 2020, government-mandated lockdown measures forced burgeoning protest movements in Iraq, Lebanon and a variety of other countries to either hit pause or disband. State security forces often enforced the bans by engaging in widescale violence against the protesters and civilians that defied them. Meanwhile, many “would-be autocrats” used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to increase their own influence by, for example, granting themselves sweeping emergency powers. 

Now, the spread of the omicron variant is forcing political leaders in democratic and authoritarian countries alike to reevaluate their policy options. In doing so, they will no doubt have to weigh a great many factors: the effectiveness of the various policies, their impact on physical and mental health, the population’s demographics and risk tolerance, broader economic factors and much else besides. But now, nearly two years into the pandemic, the time has come for leaders of democracies to consider something else: How will their decisions influence the policy choices of leaders in other countries?

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.