The New Rules: The Jury’s Still Out on Iraq War

The New Rules: The Jury’s Still Out on Iraq War

When asked for his assessment of the French Revolution's historical impact, Zhou Enlai famously replied, "It is too early to tell." Historians are fond of citing the quotation, but at times ignore its fundamental insight: that they often arrive at their judgment of historical events prematurely. Nowhere does this seem truer than in the case of America's controversial intervention in Iraq.

For most historians, the narrative of the Iraq War terminates decisively with failure in 2006, even as the chronology of its costs is generously extended decades into the future (e.g., the famous $3 trillion estimate). Meanwhile, any successes -- whether the subsequent surge or the four consecutive free national elections that preceded and followed it -- are summarily discounted as meaningless, and certainly unworthy of the accumulated cost. So it's not surprising that from this perspective, no definition of "victory," or even completion, will ever be possible.

In their rush to judge, these historians represent Iraq -- in combination with Afghanistan -- as the final and decisive "quagmire" for a declining, "imperialist" America. Moreover, the war is routinely described as a significant contributing factor to the recent global financial crisis and even a decisive reason why China will soon surpass the United States as the world's primary power. The counterfactuals suggested here are stunning, to say the least. If only former President George W. Bush and the neocons hadn't decided to topple Saddam Hussein, then America would have enjoyed real "victory" over al-Qaida and the Taliban, a still-manageable federal debt, an economic boom extended ad infinitum, continued global supremacy, and a Middle East left both unbroken and therefore still stabilized (one must assume) by Israel's monopoly of nuclear weapons.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review