The Limits of the Counterterrorism Approach

The Limits of the Counterterrorism Approach

Editor's Note: This article is one of three WPR features on the theme "The Al-Qaida We Don't Know."

Two months ago, on the seventh anniversary of the attacks of 9/11, dozens of American scholars published articles trying to determine whether al-Qaida is stronger or weaker today than it was seven years ago. Nearly all of the analysis, though, viewed al-Qaida exclusively through the theoretical lens of counterterrorism, an approach that essentially defines the organization by its choice of tactics. But ignoring the many social, cultural and historical factors that effect al-Qaida's relation to its principal constituency, the "Arab street," skews any effort to determine who is winning the War on Terror towards short-term tactical considerations, at the expense of long-term strategic ones.

For al-Qaida, terrorism is only a means to an end, designed to further the organization's strategic objective of implementing its version of Shariah, or Islamic law, throughout the Muslim world. To measure both its potential and actual progress in achieving that goal, the group must be understood in the context of Arab and Islamic culture, religion and society.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.