Terrorist Designation Was Unhelpful Against Boko Haram

Terrorist Designation Was Unhelpful Against Boko Haram

As the U.S. considers how to help Nigeria rescue some 276 schoolgirls kidnapped by the militant group Boko Haram a month ago, domestic political attention is turning to the question of what the U.S. could have done ahead of time. In particular, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come under fire for declining to add Boko Haram to the State Department’s list of designated foreign terrorist organizations, or FTO list. The implication is that the U.S. had an opportunity to prevent the kidnapping, and that the FTO list would have helped.

Secretary of State John Kerry did eventually add Boko Haram to the list last November, after what the New York Times called at the time “a spirited debate inside and outside the government” and “increasing pressure from Congress, particularly Republicans, to list the group.”

The FTO list has three basic membership requirements. To qualify, an organization must be foreign, must “engage in terrorist activity” and through such activity must threaten the United States. During the “spirited debate” about listing Boko Haram taking place in 2012, the group was certainly both foreign and terrorist, but it’s not clear it represented a threat to the United States.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.