Ramaphosa’s ‘Gaffe’ Puts the ICC’s ‘Africa’ Problem Front and Center

Ramaphosa’s ‘Gaffe’ Puts the ICC’s ‘Africa’ Problem Front and Center
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa speaks to the media after leaving an African National Congress meeting in Johannesburg, Dec. 4, 2022 (AP photo).

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa created confusion about the country’s relationship with the International Criminal Court, or ICC, this week, when he told reporters that his ruling African National Congress “has taken the decision that it is prudent that South Africa should pull out of the ICC.” But within hours, Ramaphosa’s own spokesperson issued a statement clarifying that “South Africa remains a signatory to the Rome Statute and will continue to campaign for equal and consistent application of international law.”

Ramaphosa’s initial remarks also appeared to be at odds with an announcement by South Africa’s parliament in March that it would abandon a years-long process to withdraw from the ICC. Pretoria had notified the United Nations of its intention to withdraw from the Rome Statute—the treaty that established the ICC—in 2016, arguing that membership in the court was incompatible with South Africa’s efforts to broker peace in Africa. The following year, however, a South African court ruled that the government’s decision to withdraw from the ICC without parliamentary approval was unconstitutional. In 2019, a motion was tabled in the legislature to withdraw from the Rome Statute. But the ANC’s leadership decided at last year’s national conference that it was more pragmatic for Pretoria to remain in the ICC and try to reform it from within, thus giving way to the legislature’s pronouncement that it would retract its efforts to leave the court.

For its part, the ANC issued a statement that acknowledged that party leaders had discussed withdrawing from the ICC as a measure of last resort, but also referred to last year’s decision to rescind the earlier effort to pull out of the court. The party’s statement also referred to “options to amend national legislation to domesticate the Rome Statue.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review