Rethinking Return: Defining Success in Refugee Repatriation

Rethinking Return: Defining Success in Refugee Repatriation

This summer in Jordan, I met some of the individuals behind the often anonymous news accounts of refugees fleeing Syria’s civil war. In Zaatari refugee camp, I met an accountant who carried his six-day-old daughter across the border in the dead of night after his house was destroyed, and a widow who fled with little more than $11 in her pocket after her husband died. And in a hospital in Amman, I met refugees recovering from torture so brutal that even the healing wounds were painful to look at.

Despite the horrors they endured, all the Syrian refugees I met said their dream is to return to Syria. Their dream segues with their host states’ plans: More than 2.1 million Syrians have fled their country, primarily to neighboring Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. While these countries have been remarkably hospitable, there is little prospect that they will allow the permanent local integration of hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees. As the conflict drags on, it is abundantly clear that large-scale returns will not happen anytime soon, but when they do, these movements will be complex humanitarian, socio-economic and security challenges, with important implications for peacebuilding and post-conflict reconciliation and development.

Returns are notoriously difficult to “get right.” Afghanistan is a case in point. More than 5.7 million refugees have returned to Afghanistan since 2002, mostly from neighboring Iran and Pakistan. Although they rarely make the headlines, these returnees make up some 18 percent of Afghanistan’s population. From the early stages of the repatriation movement, hopes were high that the return process would help to consolidate peace and stimulate development in Afghanistan. Yet in practice many returnees have struggled to re-access or rebuild their homes and establish decent livelihoods. Conflicts have broken out over access to land and other scarce resources. Countless returnees have moved to the swelling slums around Kabul or joined the ranks of Afghanistan’s internally displaced population. Looking back on the failure to make returns a sustainable element of peacebuilding, the head of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)—the U.N. refugee agency—in Afghanistan described the return strategy as “a big mistake, the biggest mistake UNHCR ever made.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.