Protests Leave Pakistan’s Sharif Bruised, Military Boosted

Protests Leave Pakistan’s Sharif Bruised, Military Boosted
Supporters of Pakistan's cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan wave party flags as they chant slogans during a protest near the prime minister's home in Islamabad, Pakistan, Sept. 2, 2014 (AP photo by Anjum Naveed).

On Aug. 14, the eve of its 68th Independence Day, Pakistan’s fragile democracy plunged into another period of turbulence as two sets of anti-government marches began in Lahore and made their way to Islamabad. One was led by Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf (PTI), which claimed that last year’s general elections were marred by widespread electoral fraud and demanded Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s resignation, an investigation of electoral rigging and fresh elections. The other was led by Tahir-ul Qadri and his Pakistan Awami Tehrik (PAT), and called for the dissolution of the national parliament and provincial assemblies. Qadri, who had already called to overthrow the government earlier this year, found his cause strengthened after the Punjab government, run by Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N), refused to lodge a report over a police attack on his supporters that killed 14 people and injured 100 two months ago.

For over three weeks, Islamabad has been gripped by these two sit-ins, which turned violent last week as protesters threatened to storm the prime minister’s residence and broke into and occupied the Parliament House lawns. This show of street power, while ultimately unable to overthrow the government, has renewed pressure on Sharif to deliver on campaign promises and restore the reputation of state institutions, while increasing the risk of a greater imbalance between civil and military authority.

A key question that emerges from this political crisis is why were these two parties, especially the PTI, ineffective in forcing out Sharif, despite outbreaks of street violence and a sense of chaos in the capital? For both parties, the answer lies in their lack of national support, which translates into a weak showing on the streets.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.