On Solid Ground: Toward Effective Resource-Based Development

On Solid Ground: Toward Effective Resource-Based Development

The small island-state of Timor-Leste exemplifies the challenge of resource-based development for a poor country well-endowed with a valuable natural resource. Timor-Leste, which gained its independence in 2002, has accumulated $13 billion in its petroleum fund in less than a decade. Some of the largest multinational oil companies are operating in the country, and the revenues continue to flow. And yet, while Timor-Leste has seen very notable improvements in its development indicators in the past few years, it continues to face a massive challenge of converting financial wealth into economic development. There are also heated debates about how to spend the oil revenues, or whether to spend them at all as opposed to accumulating them in an overseas fund.

Oil wealth by itself does not end a poor country’s problems. Timor-Leste’s malnutrition and stunting rates remain among the highest in the world. The electricity grids are incomplete. Many roads are in disrepair. The education system is in need of massive upgrading, and many of those seeking higher degrees now go to Indonesia or elsewhere to get them. The government is committed to transforming its economy into that of a middle-income country in a short time. In 2011, it produced a 20-year strategic development plan that laid out the priorities for public investment in a number of key sectors. While Timor-Leste has made and continues to make great progress in its development trajectory, the country illustrates the basic fact that resource-based development is extremely challenging, even for a small, democratic and financially well-resourced country.

At the core of economic development for a poor country is a successful strategy for multidimensional capital accumulation: human capital, infrastructure capital, business capital, natural capital, and technological capital. One obvious complication is that these various types of capital are complementary: The benefit of one depends on the presence of the others. A government shouldn’t focus first on roads and then on schools, for example. Without roads, it may be impossible for children to get to school. Without education, the economic benefit of roads may be very small.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review