South Africa’s Ramaphosa Disappoints on Human Rights

South Africa’s Ramaphosa Disappoints on Human Rights
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa delivers his State of the Nation Address to Parliament, in Cape Town, South Africa, Feb. 11, 2021 (pool photo by Esa Alexander via AP).

Cyril Ramaphosa’s rise to the South African presidency in 2018 generated considerable optimism that his leadership would bring a more enlightened approach to policy, both domestic and foreign. His talk of a “new dawn” and his calls for a return to the values of Nelson Mandela represented an implicit repudiation of his two immediate predecessors, Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma. In the case of the latter, Ramaphosa also promised an end to the rampant corruption and state capture that characterized Zuma’s decade in office.

Human rights organizations viewed Ramaphosa’s presidency as an opportunity for a policy reset, and they encouraged him to use his leadership—as well as South Africa’s position as a nonpermanent member of the United Nations Security Council in 2019-2020 and chair of the African Union in 2020—to revive Mandela’s commitment to the protection of human rights and the expansion of democracy. Under both Mbeki and Zuma, these ideals had been subordinated to other priorities, such as South-South solidarity, pan-African unity and the principles of sovereignty and non-interference in other states’ internal affairs.

Yet for those who put stock in Ramaphosa’s potential to promote liberal values at home and abroad, his years in office have thus far been disappointing. True, his government played a useful role during its U.N. Security Council term in shepherding through a resolution aimed at ending the scourge of sexual violence in armed conflicts. And Ramaphosa does not share Zuma’s enthusiasm for withdrawing South Africa from the International Criminal Court, an important mechanism of accountability in the global human rights regime. In fact, in June 2020, he told the National Executive Committee of the ruling African National Congress that the party must “consider a strategic retreat” from its position on withdrawing from the ICC. More generally, he has stressed South Africa’s official commitment to democratic rule and has condemned human rights violations across Africa.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article as well as three free articles per month. You'll also receive our free email newsletter to stay up to date on all our coverage:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having your own personal researcher and analyst for news and events around the globe. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of 15,000+ articles
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday
  • Weekly in-depth reports on important issues and countries
  • Daily links to must-read news, analysis, and opinion from top sources around the globe, curated by our keen-eyed team of editors
  • Your choice of weekly region-specific newsletters, delivered to your inbox.
  • Smartphone- and tablet-friendly website.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review