Why COVID-19 Complicates the Work of Environmentalists and Green Parties

Why COVID-19 Complicates the Work of Environmentalists and Green Parties
The highway leading to Barcelona is empty of cars amid the coronavirus pandemic, March 15, 2020 (AP photo by Emilio Morenatti).

In the months since the coronavirus pandemic effectively shut down large parts of the world, the changes to the environment have become one of the most visible backdrops to life under lockdown. Suddenly blue skies have provided a welcome setting for more varieties of birds, whose songs can now be heard without the roar of airplanes and car traffic. From Istanbul to New Delhi, vistas reappeared that no one alive remembered seeing. Animals started exploring what had once been their usual habitats, with flamingoes venturing in Mumbai, deer clambering through East London, and all manner of animals strolling into cities where no one had ever seen them outside of a zoo.

But beyond the cleaner air and pastoral scenes drifting into normally bustling urban landscapes, a new and complicated political reality has emerged for environmental groups and green parties, which now face a world with upended priorities. As countries emerge from the shutdowns that aimed to slow the contagion, plans to revive economies at all costs have soared to the top of the political agenda in country after country. In many cases, accepting economic sacrifices for the sake of the environment looks less appealing and less politically viable than it was before the coronavirus seized the planet.

Behind those indelible images of curious animals in new surroundings is hard data about the pandemic’s environmental and economic impact. The International Energy Agency predicts that global energy demand will fall steeply in 2020. A projected drop of 6 percent—seven times the size of the drop during the 2008 financial crisis—would reverse the past five years of demand growth. Not all of that decline in energy use is due to the virus; some of it is because the United States had a warmer-than-average winter—perhaps related to climate change—which required less heating oil and other fuel earlier in the year. But most of the drop in energy demand is due to the pandemic, which has driven down consumption of almost all forms of fuel. Demand for coal could drop by 8 percent this year, according to the IEA, the biggest decrease since World War II. Yet demand for renewable energy has stayed mostly unchanged, because energy grids prioritize use of renewable fuels, according to the IEA, partly because of the lower “marginal cost” for wind, solar and hydroelectric generation compared to traditional fossil fuel power plants.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review