Nagorno-Karabakh Elections an Exercise in Domestic Legitimacy

Nagorno-Karabakh Elections an Exercise in Domestic Legitimacy
View of Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh, Oct. 17, 2006 (photo by Flickr user hanming_huang licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license).

Earlier this month, Azerbaijan’s separatist Nagorno-Karabakh region held parliamentary elections, which were denounced by Azerbaijan, the European Union and the United States. In an email interview, Laurence Broers, editor of Caucasus Survey and a research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, discussed governance in Nagorno-Karabakh.

WPR: What are the dominant political parties in Nagorno-Karabakh, and are their platforms locally determined or driven by broader Armenian political trends?

Laurence Broers: Political parties in Nagorno-Karabakh show many of the same features as those across the wider region: Hard to distinguish ideologically, they are instead personality-driven and express the interests of key elite factions. There are currently two “parties of power” in Nagorno-Karabakh: the Free Motherland party, which was the recent winner in the de facto parliamentary elections and is led by the de facto prime minister, Ara Harutyunyan, and the Democratic Artsakh party, led by de facto parliamentary speaker, Ashot Gulyan.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.