Global Insider: IMF Reform Falls Victim to Polarized Budget Battles in Washington

Global Insider: IMF Reform Falls Victim to Polarized Budget Battles in Washington

In a budget agreement reached this month, the U.S. Congress declined to approve a package of reforms for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that the fund’s members agreed to four years ago. In an email interview, Daniel McDowell, assistant professor of political science in the Maxwell School at Syracuse University, explained the state of efforts to reform the IMF.

WPR: What has been the recent state of efforts to reform the IMF?

Daniel McDowell: In a word, stalled. The most recent push for reform began within months of the onset of the 2008 global financial crisis. The crisis revealed that the fund’s resources were far too small to deal with systemic crises in today’s massive global financial system. In an effort to bolster the IMF’s ability to deal with the European debt crisis and potential future instability, the fund asked its major shareholders for short-term loans. Meanwhile, it began the process of formally reforming fund quotas (each member country’s financial contribution to the organization) as well as the nature of the executive board (the institution’s key decision-making body). The U.S. was the driving force behind these reform efforts. In December 2010, an agreement was reached that would permanently double fund resources to $720 billion and make all 24 executive director positions on the board elected. Historically, five countries—France, Germany, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S.—have had the right to appoint directors, ostensibly crowding out representatives from other countries. The initial ratification deadline for these reforms was October 2012. While the vast majority of member countries signed off on the changes by that date, the reforms have repeatedly run into problems in the U.S. Congress. Multiple requests to Congress by the U.S. Treasury to pass the reforms have failed to produce results.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article as well as three free articles per month. You'll also receive our free email newsletter to stay up to date on all our coverage:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having your own personal researcher and analyst for news and events around the globe. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of 15,000+ articles
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday
  • Weekly in-depth reports on important issues and countries
  • Daily links to must-read news, analysis, and opinion from top sources around the globe, curated by our keen-eyed team of editors
  • Your choice of weekly region-specific newsletters, delivered to your inbox.
  • Smartphone- and tablet-friendly website.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review