Global Insider: France-Britain Military Cooperation

Britain and France are launching a joint effort to examine possibilities for defense cooperation in the face of shrinking defense budgets. In an e-mail interview, Nick Witney, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations and former chief executive of the European Defence Agency in Brussels, explains the context for current France-Britain military cooperation.

WPR: What are some of the historic differences between Britain and France's defense postures?

Nick Witney: We've won more times than they have! Think Agincourt, Trafalgar . . . More seriously, since World War II, the main differences have stemmed from France's independent, Gaullist defense policies, contrasted with Britain's emphasis on its "special relationship" with the U.S. and its de facto role as No. 2 in NATO. Thus, while Britain was benefiting, at various times and to varying degrees, from an American helping hand on nuclear propulsion for submarines, its nuclear deterrent and satellite intelligence, France has chosen to develop all these capabilities for itself. That's been a formidable technological achievement, but one that has often left French conventional forces poorly equipped, as the first Gulf War demonstrated.

WPR: How have developments over the past few years -- the financial crisis, France's reintegration of NATO -- changed that?

Witney: Alongside the differences mentioned above, there have also been many similarities between the postures of the two countries -- in size, resources, the consciousness of a glorious past, and a determination to remain important actors on the world stage (e.g., as permanent members of the U.N. Security Council). So they are an excellent "fit" for cooperation, and have done joint armaments projects together since the 1960s -- from Jaguar combat aircraft and Puma helicopters to Storm Shadow cruise missiles. The residue of mutual political suspicions has now been largely swept away by French President Nicolas Sarkozy's decision to bring France fully back into NATO, and the defense budget crunch in both countries has given each an urgent further incentive to find new ways to pool efforts and resources.

WPR: What are some concrete points of potential cooperation and/or disagreement moving forward?

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review