Emulating China and Russia, More Countries Crack Down on Internet Freedoms

Emulating China and Russia, More Countries Crack Down on Internet Freedoms
A man reads a news report on his mobile phone, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Dec. 20, 2018 (AP photo).

The government in the Democratic Republic of Congo cut internet and text message services across the country two days in a row last week, as tensions rose ahead of the release of official results from last month’s presidential election. It was just the latest move to restrict internet access by a state with a poor democratic track record, as more countries appear to take their digital cues from the likes of China and Russia.

Last year, Thailand proposed a cybersecurity law that would give the government “sweeping powers” to surveil the internet, censor content and even seize computers “without judicial oversight.” The United Arab Emirates tightened its cybercrime laws by allowing stronger enforcement actions against those inciting acts “deemed” to be against the country’s interest. Egypt similarly gave its judges greater power to censor online content found to threaten “national security.”

Tanzania’s strict new internet law, which gives its Communication Regulatory Authority powers to censor content, are increasingly forcing bloggers offline. Uganda, apparently influenced by Tanzania’s law, enacted a social media tax in 2018 that charges citizens more to access platforms like Twitter or WhatsApp, which mirrors practices in Iran, where foreign websites cost twice as much to access as domestic ones. Turkey expanded the government’s online censorship power. Kazakhstan banned anonymous online comments. Even Israel considered an internet censorship law. And on the first day of 2019, a controversial cybersecurity law went into effect in Vietnam that “puts stringent controls on tech companies operating inside the country” and “censors what its citizens read online.” The country has already claimed that Facebook has violated that law by allowing users to post what Vietnamese authorities call “anti-government” comments and apparently refusing to respond to the government’s requests to censor content.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.