Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Revive International Cooperation?

Could the Coronavirus Pandemic Revive International Cooperation?
French President Emmanuel Macron speaks with G-7 leaders during a videoconference on the coronavirus pandemic, at the Elysee Palace in Paris, April 16, 2020 (pool photo by Gonzalo Fuentes via AP Images).

When does a global catastrophe stimulate a revival of international cooperation, rather than accelerate fragmentation and disorder? When does a crisis become a turning point in international relations, rather than just augur more of the same? These questions loom large in the COVID-19 pandemic, the biggest shock to world politics and the global economy since 1945. While history provides no definitive answers, it hints at three preconditions for resurrecting international cooperation from the ashes: new thinking, enlightened leadership and a favorable distribution of power.

It was in reaction to World War II, and the economic chaos that preceded it, that the United States laid plans for an open, rules-based postwar international system. The political and economic foundations for this liberal and cooperative world order were set during wartime conferences at Dumbarton Oaks, in Washington, D.C., and in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. The former produced plans for the United Nations, a new global body to promote peace and security, endorsed by 50 nations in San Francisco on June 26, 1945—75 years ago last Friday. The latter created two new multilateral institutions, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, to promote financial stability, wartime recovery and global development. Although negotiations for an International Trade Organization failed, a new multilateral trading system emerged through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which later became the World Trade Organization.

Not all global catastrophes have such a fortunate resolution. The great slaughter of World War I resulted in a peace at once Carthaginian and inconclusive: harsh enough to embitter Germany but not so severe as to prevent its resurgence. The League of Nations, created in 1919 to deter and punish aggressors, failed to do either and faded into irrelevance as fascism and militarism ran rampant in the 1930s. Likewise, the Great Depression elicited little international cooperation, as the world’s most powerful economies adopted a slew of discriminatory, protectionist and beggar-thy-neighbor policies, typified by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff in the United States in 1930 and the British system of Imperial Preference established in 1932. The London Economic Conference of 1933 intended to stabilize the world economy but failed thanks to U.S. intransigence. The resulting economic fragmentation prolonged the global slump and poisoned international diplomacy.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.