Big-Power ‘Buffering’ Mechanisms Needed to Manage Era of Disorder

Big-Power ‘Buffering’ Mechanisms Needed to Manage Era of Disorder
Pro-Russian rebel military vehicle with Russian flag on top of it rolls towards Donetsk, Eastern Ukraine, Nov. 10, 2014 (AP photo by Mstyslav Chernov).

There were signs of easing tensions in some parts of the international system last week, but warnings of deepening crises on other fronts. It emerged that U.S. President Barack Obama had sent a private letter to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, urging greater cooperation in the fight against the so-called Islamic State (IS) in Iraq. China and Japan agreed to step back from confrontation over the Senkaku Islands, claimed by Beijing as the Diaoyu. But Ukraine accused Russia of new military incursions on its territory, increasing the chances that the parlous cease-fire in the east of the country will totally collapse.

It is tempting to scrutinize such developments for clues about the shape of a new world order. Perhaps China and Iran will evolve into reliable allies for the West, an optimist might infer, while Russia will inevitably isolate itself through its bellicosity.

Such strategic speculations do not really add up. Instead, complex diplomatic overtures, political compromises and military forays are likely to be the “new normal” of a disorderly world. The hallmark of this period could very well be its fluidity.

Keep reading for free.

Register below for instant access to the rest of this article (no credit card required). You'll also get our free newsletters and two pieces of expert analysis each month. Simply click one of the icons below to instantly login with a social account, or use your email address:
Or skip to premium access for just $12 for the first 12 weeks.
After 12 weeks you'll be charged $77 annually.