go to top

In Libya, Political Will Catches Up With New R2P Norm

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 (.pdf) resulted in prompt international action that delivered Libyans from the murderous violence Moammar Gadhafi had already inflicted on civilians early in March, as well as from violence he continued to threaten against what he called, in an eerie echo of Rwanda's murderous regime in 1994, the "cockroaches" who opposed him. Earlier, the council's Resolution 1970 (.pdf) had unanimously approved an arms embargo, asset freeze, travel ban and reference to the International Criminal Court. In addition, the U.N. Human Rights Council unequivocally condemned Libya, which led to the General Assembly's unprecedented decision to suspend Libyan membership in the council.

Behind these decisions, which were rapid and robust by U.N. or any standards, was the emerging norm of "the responsibility to protect" (R2P), the title of a 2001 report from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). Four years after its release, at the 2005 World Summit marking the U.N.'s 60th anniversary, although some 150 assembled presidents, prime ministers and princes agreed on little else, they did agree with the report's major conclusion: that military intervention to protect the vulnerable was desirable and acceptable -- not for garden variety human rights abuses but for "genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity." ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.