go to top

The Realist Prism: Reconciling the New Obama Doctrine With the Old

Friday, April 29, 2011

The run-up to the Libya operation created a great deal of buzz in the foreign policy community about the emergence of a new "Obama Doctrine," one that provides a rationale for the use of U.S. military force to achieve humanitarian ends. But President Barack Obama himself recognizes that he cannot completely dispense with the old Obama Doctrine, which he articulated when he was a candidate for office. The initial view propounded by the then-junior senator from Illinois was one of "restrained engagement" with the rest of the world: liquidating costly overseas military ventures; finding diplomacy-based compromises with other states, rather than insisting on preferential outcomes; and most critically, focusing domestically on the renewal of the economic and technological sources of U.S. power.

Significantly, a temporary "stepping back" was also designed to nudge other countries around the world to consider the benefits they enjoyed from a U.S.-led international system. In many ways, this was in the spirit of Niall Ferguson's 2004 challenge: "If the United States retreats from its hegemonic role, who would supplant it? Not Europe, not China, not the Muslim world -- and certainly not the United Nations. Unfortunately, the alternative to a single superpower is not a multilateral utopia, but the anarchic nightmare of a new Dark Age." Drawing down the scope and intensity of U.S. involvement in the world was therefore intended, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton noted, "to help the international community accept responsibility." ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.