go to top

Budget Cuts Threaten U.K. Trident Replacement

Tuesday, Sept. 14, 2010

When George Osborne, Britain's new chancellor of the exchequer, recently announced that the Ministry of Defense (MoD) must now pay for the modernization of the Trident submarine-based nuclear deterrent out of its own day-to-day budget, it marked a stark change from previous policy, by which the Treasury has traditionally footed the bill for nuclear weapons development. Though the plans are not new, the announcement caused a public row between Defense Secretary Liam Fox and Osborne. Fox has warned that with the MoD's budget already in tatters, it will be impossible to maintain the MoD's other capabilities if it has to meet the full cost of the Trident replacement program alone. Given the possible ramifications for the defense industry, leading manufacturers have even written to Prime Minister David Cameron about the proposal, noting it has proven "unsettling for investors." The accounting decision means that plans to modernize Trident on a like-for-like basis are likely to come under increased scrutiny.

Because of Britain's current budget deficit of 11 percent, government departments across the board have been ordered to make substantial savings. In July, Fox called MoD's then-current obligations to shave 20 percent -- or £7 billion -- off its budget by 2015 "the absolute mother of horrors of a spending review." This was allegedly before he received news that the MoD would also be responsible for absorbing the cost of Trident modernization -- whose estimates range from £20 billion to £76 billion. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.