go to top
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa wearing a face mask at the NASREC Expo Center in Johannesburg. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa at the NASREC Expo Center in Johannesburg, April 24, 2020 (AP photo by Jerome Delay).

How Ramaphosa’s Failures Left South Africa Vulnerable to a Pandemic

Monday, Aug. 24, 2020

When Cyril Ramaphosa became president of South Africa in February 2018, many South Africans saw it as a “new dawn” for their country. In the aftermath of Jacob Zuma’s corruption-plagued presidency, Ramaphosa seemed to offer the hope of competent leadership and accountable government. Commentators spoke of “Ramaphoria,” as the new president sought to revive the spirit of idealism that informed the early days of post-apartheid South Africa in the 1990s, and to engineer a definitive break with what he acknowledged were “nine wasted years” under Zuma.

Ramaphosa promised more than just a change in the political atmospherics, however. His administration committed itself to tackling a series of interconnected socioeconomic issues that Zuma had neglected. Many South Africans were suffering from soaring levels of poverty and inequality, as well as a grave unemployment crisis. To help address these problems and boost the country’s anemic economic growth, Ramaphosa pledged to attract $100 billion of foreign direct investment over five years. At the same time, he hoped to rebuild the integrity and capacity of a state apparatus that had become unfit for public service due to the cronyism of the Zuma era. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.