go to top
Cyril Ramaphosa, then serving as South Africa’s deputy president, delivers a speech marking the 28th anniversary of Nelson Mandela’s release from prison, Cape Town, South Africa, Feb. 11, 2018 (AP photo).

Zuma’s Exit Was Proof of the Health of South Africa’s Democracy

, Friday, March 23, 2018

Amid the drama last month of Jacob Zuma’s resignation as South African president and Cyril Ramaphosa’s subsequent inauguration, it was easy to overlook the resiliency of South Africa’s democracy during Zuma’s nine years in power, which were marked by poor governance, corruption and his authoritarian style. By the end, the political opposition, the judiciary, the media and the electorate all successfully exerted pressure on the ruling African National Congress to remove him. Zuma’s departure was a crisis for the ANC, but not for South Africa’s democratic institutions and the rule of law.

When it decided that he had to go, the ANC followed party and parliamentary procedure to the letter. Unlike the unexpected exit last year of long-time President Robert Mugabe in neighboring Zimbabwe, Zuma’s departure was no coup, either by the party or within the state. It is fair to say that in a country with lesser institutions and a weaker commitment to democracy, Zuma might instead have held on and even consolidated his power, following the path of Paul Kagame in Rwanda, Laurent Kabila and his son, Joseph, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Yoweri Museveni in Uganda. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.