go to top
A U.S. Marine major walks past a line of soldiers from the Uganda People’s Defense Force as they engage in weapons training at the Singo facility in Kakola, Uganda, April 30, 2012 (AP photo by Ben Curtis).

After Niger, Is America’s ‘Light Footprint’ Counterterrorism Strategy Sustainable?

Friday, Nov. 17, 2017

The United States has always been a reluctant superpower. While most political leaders and observers have believed that promoting security around the world benefits the United States, the public has to be sold on the idea of global activism. Among other things, this makes it important to control the costs of involvement in distant places without direct ties to the United States, particularly U.S. military casualties.

This has been done in two ways: by relying on security partners to bear the brunt of deterring and fighting adversaries, and by sustaining an advanced U.S. military to overmatch enemies when it does fight. Following the 1991 Gulf War with Iraq, for instance, the U.S. military pursued a high-tech “revolution in military affairs” designed to augment its battlefield superiority. But after 9/11, it was no longer enough to have an advantage on conventional battlefields. As transnational networks of terrorists and insurgents became America’s primary enemies, the challenge was finding a way to deal with this very different threat while continuing to limit the strategic costs, particularly to American lives. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.