go to top
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry chats with Ambassador Susan Rice, the President’s National Security Advisor, at the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2014 (State Department photo).

Shake-Ups Won’t Address U.S. Foreign Policy’s Real Problems

Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2015

Last week’s dramatic recommendation for U.S. President Barack Obama to fire his entire national security team, delivered by Les Gelb, the president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, was eagerly disseminated among Washington’s foreign policy denizens. But while there is continued interest in determining who’s up and who’s down in the president’s inner circle, personnel changes alone would not address all of the concerns Gelb raised. Instead, his criticisms point to some fundamental problems with the U.S. national security class as a whole.

The first is that U.S. policymakers who came of age during the brief unipolar moment at the end of the Cold War remain unused to operating in conditions of real multipolarity, where other major powers have the ability to resist U.S. directives and to significantly raise the costs of U.S. initiatives. Rhetoric about “the indispensable nation” has a tendency to become self-reinforcing. This explains the overinflated belief among U.S. policymakers in Washington’s ability to compel other states to do its bidding, and their continued incredulity that other countries would not see how supporting the U.S. agenda would serve the global interest. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.