go to top

The Realist Prism: Asia Pivot to Suffer as Obama’s Attention Returns to Middle East

Friday, Sept. 27, 2013

This week, speaking before the United Nations General Assembly, President Barack Obama laid out a U.S. foreign policy agenda for the remainder of his term in office, with particular emphasis on finding a solution to the impasse over the Iranian nuclear program and making a lasting breakthrough in the seemingly intractable Israeli-Palestinian dispute. However, the overall focus of the address, with its emphasis on the centrality of the Middle East, is seemingly at odds with the direction articulated earlier in his administration, most notably by former National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: the so-called pivot to Asia. It is hard to reconcile the vision laid out by the president in New York this past week with Donilon's contention that the United States has been "overweighted" in terms of its commitment of time and resources to the Middle East (.pdf).

Of course, it is entirely possible that Obama's address was meant to be aspirational—laying out objectives that he might want to see happen, but without any plans to make the concurrent commitment to realizing these goals. After all, the history of presidential rhetoric is replete with examples of calls for action that did not end up guiding the allocation of resources, funds or attention. George W. Bush, for instance, started his presidency with a call to reorient U.S. foreign policy towards the Western Hemisphere, but, with the notable example of Plan Colombia, this rebalancing did not occur. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.