go to top

Strategic Horizons: Want to Attack Iran? Then Make a Case

Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012

Talk of a U.S. attack on Iran is like a late-summer thunderstorm that rumbles ominously in the distance without ever drifting further away. Few American observers advocate an immediate attack, but a growing number hint that the question is when, not if, a strike takes place. The distance from saber-rattling to war is narrowing.

As is often the case in the prelude to war, the discussion has so far been informed more by passion than by analysis, stoked by popular distrust of the Iranian regime. As the United States found when contemplating the invasion of Iraq in 2002, such an over-heated environment makes it difficult to coolly assess alternatives. But to avoid disaster, that is exactly what we must do. The burden of proof lies with those who contend that an attack is necessary and that the strategic benefits for U.S. national security outweigh the costs. So far advocates of military action have not made their case. If they are to do so, they must first answer three central questions. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.