Angola’s Opposition Questions dos Santos’ Opaque China Deals

Angola’s Opposition Questions dos Santos’ Opaque China Deals
Angolan President Jose Eduardo Dos Santos and Chinese President Xi Jinping attend a signing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People, Beijing, China, June 9, 2015 (Wang Zhao/Pool Photo via AP).

During a session of the Angolan parliament late last month, members of the main opposition party, UNITA, boycotted a vote on a private investment law because of concerns over transparency. It was a rare display of dissent against President Jose Eduardo dos Santos, with some UNITA lawmakers questioning the details surrounding recent loan deals with China, struck during dos Santos’ visit to Beijing in June. “How much did our president get from China? Nobody knows. How will we pay for it? Nobody knows,” Raul Danda, a UNITA legislator, told his fellow parliamentarians. “We asked our president to explain what he did in China but the boss does not talk.”

In Beijing, dos Santos negotiated eight cooperation agreements, including a financial assistance deal. But the details of the loan have not been publicly disclosed. Dos Santos’ government is reportedly planning to borrow $25 billion to fill a budget gap brought on by the slump in global oil prices. According to estimates, China has already lent Angola some $20 billion since its civil war ended in 2002. Angola repays the debt mainly through oil—China is Angola’s biggest customer—or, as Reuters noted, funds that “go directly to Chinese construction firms that have built roads, hospitals, houses and railways across Angola.”

For UNITA, the newest loans raise two particular issues. First, Angola’s constitution states that the president may sign and ratify international agreements only if they are previously approved by the parliament. Second, if such agreements include loans, the president cannot request amounts that surpass the limits defined by the state budget law. For 2015, that limit is $9 billion, which may create a problem as dos Santos has already received $7.5 billion in loans from Europe and the United States this year. That may be one of the reasons why he has shrouded the Chinese loans in secrecy and avoided disclosing the amounts involved.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review