A Changing of the Guard? The U.S., Britain and France After the Syria Crisis

A Changing of the Guard? The U.S., Britain and France After the Syria Crisis

In the weeks since British Prime Minister David Cameron lost a parliamentary vote that would have authorized the use of force in Syria, commentators have breathlessly debated whether the crisis over the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons has heralded a significant shift in Western security relationships. Some have been moved to claim that, as a consequence of the vote, Paris is gradually replacing London as Washington’s European security partner of choice. While certainly providing food for thought in both the U.K. and France, such claims are profoundly misleading. Insofar as the United States chooses to work with its European partners on security issues, the U.K. will remain first among equals. The real significance of the crisis lies in the way it reveals longer-term trends: the crippling dependence of both major European states on their American ally, and the latter’s tendency to disregard their sensibilities in pursuing its own interests.

The governments of Britain and France were cheerleaders-in-chief for firm action against the Syrian regime. From the early days of the uprising, France strongly backed the rebels and called for the ousting of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. London and Paris together persuaded their European Union partners to lift an arms embargo on Syria. And both were vociferous in pressing for military retaliation against the regime for its use of chemical weapons.

And then, suddenly, everything changed. The U.K., courtesy of a vote in the House of Commons, was left high and dry, excluded from talks on possible military action as Paris and Washington continued their discussions. The subsequent decision by U.S. President Barack Obama to consult Congress prior to ordering military intervention left France in turn out on a limb, isolated in its continued insistence on the need to “punish” the Assad regime.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.