Last week's discussion at the U.N. Security Council on the security implications of climate change was an important step in the right direction. This is only the second time that the subject, which may turn out to be the defining issue for global security in the 21st century, has made it onto the agenda of the U.N. body charged with maintaining international peace and security. The discussion's importance is limited, however, since the real path to addressing the security implications of climate change lies outside the council. The special session, initiated by Germany, focused specifically on the council's role in preventing climate-induced conflict over increasingly scarce food, water and arable land. The solution to these conflicts, however, can only be found in reducing carbon emissions -- including by scaling up the deployment of renewable energy technologies and increasing energy efficiency measures -- and not in responding to climate crises once they have occurred.
The physical effects of a warming climate are now widely regarded as, in the words of the U.K. National Security Strategy document, "risk multipliers." Everyone from the U.S. National Intelligence Council (.pdf) to the Royal Society (.pdf) has highlighted the link between the consequences of higher global temperatures and human insecurity. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Global Insights: Once Again Relevant, NATO Will Now Be Judged on Effectiveness
- Global Insights: Managing Partnerships, not Enlargement, Is NATO’s Real Challenge
- Diplomatic Fallout: Why the International System Is Still Worth Fighting For
- BRICS Bank Will Bolster, Not Challenge, Global Financial System
- The Realist Prism: Syria, Ukraine May Force Obama to Learn to Love Coalitions of the Willing