On Monday, USA Today reported that the United States Air Force was increasing the size of its Afghanistan contingent in order to keep up with the dramatic expansion in the rate of airstrikes since Gen. David Petraeus took over command of the war effort.
To some, the fact that Petraeus -- the American military figure most associated with FM 3-24 (.pdf), also known as the counterinsurgency (COIN) manual -- is responsible for increasing the use of airpower in Aghanistan represents a paradox. FM 3-24 takes a notably dim view of airstrikes, suggesting that they "can cause collateral damage that turns people against the host-nation government and provides insurgents with a major propaganda victory. Even when justified under the law of war, bombings that result in civilian casualties can bring media coverage that works to the insurgents' benefit." Soldiers with rifles, it is implied, are better at protecting civilians than fighter jets with bombs. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Global Insights: Hagel Visit Shows Limits of U.S. Agenda in Afghanistan, Pakistan
- India-Israel Ties Complicated by Iran Opening, Shifting Defense Priorities
- Strategic Horizons: For U.S. in Afghanistan, Zero Option Not So Bad After All
- Pakistan’s Kayani Leaves Behind Mixed Legacy of Reform as Army Chief
- Policy Debate Over Drone Strikes Muddied by Competing Data