On Monday, USA Today reported that the United States Air Force was increasing the size of its Afghanistan contingent in order to keep up with the dramatic expansion in the rate of airstrikes since Gen. David Petraeus took over command of the war effort.
To some, the fact that Petraeus -- the American military figure most associated with FM 3-24 (.pdf), also known as the counterinsurgency (COIN) manual -- is responsible for increasing the use of airpower in Aghanistan represents a paradox. FM 3-24 takes a notably dim view of airstrikes, suggesting that they "can cause collateral damage that turns people against the host-nation government and provides insurgents with a major propaganda victory. Even when justified under the law of war, bombings that result in civilian casualties can bring media coverage that works to the insurgents' benefit." Soldiers with rifles, it is implied, are better at protecting civilians than fighter jets with bombs. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Qatar Ties Reflect India’s Middle East Balancing Act
- As U.S. Draws Down, Afghanistan’s Women Weigh Uncertain Future
- Hard-line Politics in India and Pakistan Stymie Deeper Trade Ties
- Afghanistan’s Ghani Builds Regional Momentum for Taliban Talks
- Sirisena’s Promised Reforms Help Reset Sri Lanka-India Ties—for Now