Confronting Iran in a Changing Middle East

During President Barack Obama’s first term, much was made of his administration’s “pivot” toward Asia. Given the increased strategic and economic significance of Asia to the United States, there are strong arguments for this rebalancing of focus. Nevertheless, the symbolism was lost on no one when, in late-November, Obama was forced to interrupt his trip to Asia to address the latest flare-up in violence between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. As Obama begins his second term, it is safe to assume that events in the Middle East will continue to occupy a considerable amount of bandwidth for the administration, even as Washington continues to manage a rebalancing of U.S. security investments.
Chief among the president’s Middle East agenda items will be Iran. While the Obama administration is working on a number of important issues in the region, its priority is the continued multilateral effort to achieve a negotiated end to possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program, while also avoiding another costly and unnecessary military conflict. It is important, however, not to see the Iran issue in isolation, but to attempt to understand how other regional dynamics relate to and impact those efforts. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- Global Insights: Syria Crisis Overshadows Broader Turkey-U.S. Tensions
- The Realist Prism: China the Likely Winner if U.S. Intervenes in Syria
- Russia Tries to Manage Arab Awakening From the Outside
- The Realist Prism: Narrowed Focus in U.S.-Russia Relations Proves Productive
- World Citizen: Israel’s Syria Strike Reflects Favorable Cost-Benefit Calculus


