Although Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system intercepted its first missile in April 2011, it officially came of age last November during Israel’s Operation Pillar of Defense, the latest iteration of the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Of some 500 Gaza-fired rockets and missiles that Iron Dome’s radar identified as likely to hit populated areas, as opposed to falling into the sea or open fields, about 420 were shot down, for a success rate of 85 percent. In the process Iron Dome provided the majority of Israel’s population with a deep sense of security: Though they were being targeted by Palestinian fire, Israelis felt an effective countermeasure was in place to protect them.
In the weeks since the most recent round of hostilities ended, the Iron Dome system has received nothing but high praise. Hailed as a product of “Jewish genius,” the “one clear winner in the latest round of hostilities between Israel and Hamas” and a “military revolution,” the system is reportedly now being considered for purchase by numerous governments, including South Korea, Singapore and Turkey. But if the technological breakthroughs and military advantages gained in fielding the system in a relatively short time have rightly attracted attention, other issues have been ignored. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $18 monthly or $118/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- International Law Solutions Fall Short for Israelis, Palestinians in Gaza Conflict
- The Realist Prism: On Iran and Russia, Obama Gambling for More Time
- World Citizen: In Israel, Pragmatism Could Trump Ideology After the Fighting
- Strategic Horizons: U.S. Must Rethink Unsustainable Counterterrorism Strategy
- Diplomatic Fallout: West Needs New Rules to Contain Proxy Wars With Russia