BEIJING -- After much fanfare and stagecraft, China's leadership transition, the most prolonged and pored-over in more than 30 years, ultimately ended with a distinct sense of anticlimax. The seven men who will rule China are, as reported by the South China Morning Post two weeks before the event, largely older, conservative cadres. Their identical suits and coiffures, as well as their stiff demeanor amid the stifling Stalinist décor, underscored the apparent dislocation between them and the society they have been anointed to lead. This is a group unlikely to implement the kind of accelerated reforms to China's politics, economy and society that many had hoped for. Perhaps the only bright spot is that five of them will retire in 2017.
Throughout the year that preceded the formal announcement, speculation as to the final composition of the Politburo Standing Committee had been rife. Following the downfall of disgraced Chongqing boss Bo Xilai, there were signals to suggest reformists were gaining the ascendency in Beijing. Outgoing President Hu Jintao issued several public slap-downs to the military, and financial market reform accelerated. Meanwhile, whispers circulated about the emergence of a younger, more progressive senior leadership. Locals and foreigners, already weary from the seemingly endless period of transition in Chinese politics, sensed that perhaps change was finally in the air. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Greece’s Reversal Puts China’s Mediterranean Plans Back on Track
- Global Insights: As China Ponders BMD Options, U.S. Must Consider Responses
- Fishing Wars: China’s Aggression Could Stoke Future Conflict
- North Korea’s Economic Reforms Constrained by Geopolitical Isolation
- World Citizen: China’s New Latin America Ties Are Strategic, Not Just Economic