The sudden death last week of Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Nayyif, the heir apparent to King Abdullah, caught many by surprise. But the latest royal shuffle, which sees Prince Salman becoming the new crown prince, and the even bigger transition expected to occur in the near future given the poor health of the 88-year-old king will likely feature far greater continuity and stability than the political transformations occurring in Egypt and other Arab countries.
The purported ideological tug-of-war taking place inside the royal family is a central theme of much of the commentary on Saudi succession scenarios, with the “reactionaries” and “conservatives,” supposedly led by the now deceased Nayyif, on one side, and the “liberals,” including King Abdullah and the “younger generation” of princes in their 50s and 60s, on the other. According to this narrative, whichever side wins will determine the state’s political trajectory, for better or worse. Last October, for example, when Nayyif became crown prince, Ed Husain of the Council of Foreign Relations described his appointment as “a step backward” that ended “the dream of bringing Saudi Arabia into the 21st century.” Taking that view to its natural conclusion, Simon Henderson, in an article in Foreign Policy titled “Good Riddance,” suggested that “we should be happy [Nayyif is] gone.” ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: Obama’s Islamic State Strategy Avoids Failure—but Also Success
- Yemen’s Women Fight to Protect Uprising’s Gains Amid New Turmoil
- Russia Becomes the Middle East’s Preferred but Flawed Nuclear Partner
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.N. Serves as Perfect Alibi for Big Power Inaction in Unfixable Crises
- Qatar Ties Reflect India’s Middle East Balancing Act