U.S.-India Relations: Case-by-Case Basis, With No Guarantees

Beginning with the George W. Bush administration, the U.S. strategic policymaking community has expressed its desire to support India’s emergence as a great power. However, the very fact that these exhortations must be made from time to time reveals the distance the world’s two largest democracies must still travel to truly understand each other. The U.S. continues to struggle with India’s non-alignment impulses, while India continues to see relations in a globalized era as depending on balance of interests, and not balance of power.
Indeed, it is this differing approach to globalization that prevents the two countries from fully consolidating bilateral relations. Globalization during the post-Cold War “end of history” moment coincided with a planet-wide examination of essentially Western views on governance and economics. However, the financial crisis in the West and the near-simultaneous resurgence of China and India has put paid to any single globalization narrative. In the case of India in particular, many Western observers interpret New Delhi’s behavior as a reflexive quest for strategic autonomy. To do so, however, is to ignore the numerous areas where U.S. and Indian interests diverge. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- The Realist Prism: To Draw Down War on Terror, Obama Must Turn Rhetoric Into Action
- For Europe in Afghanistan, Long-term Commitment Despite Lack of Interests
- China-India Border Incident Highlights Uncertainties in Bilateral Relations
- Global Insights: Sharif’s Victory Offers U.S. Opportunity to Reset Pakistan Ties
- Sharif Poised for Return to National Stage in Pakistan Elections


