The latest IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear program is a particularly bad piece of news for an Obama administration that is already coping with other brushfires in the Middle East. If President Barack Obama is re-elected next year, then Iran will very likely cross the nuclear finish line on his watch. Given the “musical chairs” nature of U.S. politics, where the person left standing when the music stops loses, the blame for Tehran getting the bomb will fall squarely on Obama’s shoulders, even though one could quite fairly apportion a fair share to the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Since 2009, the Obama administration has been struggling to find an effective yet low-cost way to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. During the 2008 presidential campaign, there were suggestions about using diplomacy to find some sort of “grand bargain”: In return for U.S. security guarantees and economic incentives, Iran would accept stricter IAEA safeguards more likely to prevent weaponization of its civilian nuclear program. After taking office, when the administration’s initial diplomatic initiatives didn’t work, it shifted to a three-track approach. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
- TWO WEEKS FREE.
- Cancel any time.
- After two weeks, just $11.99 monthly or $94.99/year.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Middle East’s Sectarian Tensions Play Out in Sudan-Iran Relations
- Strategic Horizons: U.S. Strategy for Defeating the Islamic State Group Won't Work
- A Tale of Two Interventions: U.S. Content to Contain Islamic State Group and Ebola
- World Citizen: The King’s Speech Signals Shift in Dutch, European Worries
- The Realist Prism: Can Obama Count on ‘Coalition of the Willing’ to Fight Islamic State Group?