Why the Global Magnitsky Act Is the Best Way to Sanction Saudi Arabia

Why the Global Magnitsky Act Is the Best Way to Sanction Saudi Arabia
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Oct. 22, 2018 (Saudi Press Agency photo via AP Images).

Editor’s note: Guest columnist Neil Bhatiya is filling in for Judah Grunstein, who will be back next week.

Saudi Arabia continues to face unprecedented criticism from the United States, its longstanding regional ally, over the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul four weeks ago. Earlier this month, Congress formally asked the Trump administration to determine whether Khashoggi’s killing exposed Saudi leaders to sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act, a law passed two years ago with broad bipartisan support to punish credibly accused violators of human rights around the world.

Saudi Arabia is trying to move as quickly as possible to avoid such international condemnation. Some in Washington, including Republican Sen. Rand Paul, have suggested that Global Magnitsky Act sanctions are a way of letting the Saudis off easy—to blame some Saudi officials without actually impacting the regime in Riyadh. That would be a damning precedent, but it isn’t a foregone conclusion. The Trump administration could, instead, deploy the Global Magnitsky Act more effectively, strengthening the law in the process and repairing the administration’s own reputation when it comes to defending human rights.

Keep reading for free.

Register below for instant access to the rest of this article (no credit card required). You'll also get our free newsletters and two pieces of expert analysis each month. Simply click one of the icons below to instantly login with a social account, or use your email address:
Or skip to premium access for just $12 for the first 12 weeks.
After 12 weeks you'll be charged $77 annually.